TO EUROPEAN COURT OF THE HUMAN RIGHTS

THIRD SECTION

 

Ref. Application 10675/2003

Dimakos v. Romania

 

As the following undersigning Dimakos Ioannis applicant against Romania address: Loc. Certeze, Str. Draguiasa no. 120, jud. Satu Mare:

-               Following the 15 of may 2009 from your letter that specify the process of litigation and, define the final – time on 2^nd September as long as Romanian State will be submitted their objections against the admissibility in my case.

-               Following your refusal to visit the registry of the court and pick up copies of the encounter of the Romanian State.

-               Following the decision of the Supreme Judicial Court of justice on 2^nd of September 2009 which has an extension for submitting encounter the Romanian State to 2^nd of October 2009.

-               Following my distress telephonic call, at the European Court Register office.

-               I have the honor to hereby inform you of the following:

1)          Informed by the Secretary of the European Court that the Romanian State on 2/10/2009 sent by mail in the court their observations. But until today 19/11/2009 post didn’t give those documents to the Court.

2)          I understand that on 2/10/2009 Romanian State faxed to the encounter, but can not be examined because it required original documents and not copies.

In light of all the above informed both, the Greek Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Department of International Judicial Affairs and the Romanian Foreign Affairs and asked their help to finally be a solution to the impeccable of my case.

-        After all this above inform and the Court that:

The Romanian State was and is unreliable in my case and any delay matchmaker in my case suspected. Because wants to cover political and Judicial bodies who literally stole my property without to respect the terms of the European Convention of the property protection and the terms of the human Rights.

From other part I, if I was imprisoned and constantly pressed by the inhuman conditions of my prison. I was always consistent in my obligations towards any requirement of the HUDOC and are always presented in the requested documents to any time, in spite of the obstacles I had to face, obstacles that was applied the Romanian State and all I had write and proved in my application.  

But as evidenced by the Romanian State is not consistent, and if the 15.05.2009 has been updated, if and helped with the decision by 2/04/2009 and was given until 2/10/2009 to submit their observations. So far I have not presented the documents to answer in accordance with the regulations of the European Court.

-               Then such all the above the following:

To cancel any objections of the Romanian State as out of the limit-time and force the Romanian State to respect the European Convention in the accordance with the Article 41 and to accept an amicable settlement to finally my suffering from 1998 until today.

 

With respect

 

 

19 Nov. 2009